Contempt petition alleging non-compliance with a prior order in a criminal original petition. The Government Advocate reported the final report had been filed and taken on file in C.C.No.167 of 2024 before the Judicial Magistrate, Aranthangi; recording this, the court closed the contempt petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.(MD)No.2248 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 22.11.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
Cont.P.(MD)No.2248 of 2024 in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.8521 of 2024
Manjula
... Petitioner
versus
Mr.S.Karunakaran, The Inspector of Police, Nagudi Police Station, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondent
Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the contemnor/respondent for his willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.8521 of 2024 dated 12.06.2024.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Saranya For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottaichamy, Government Advocate (Crl. side)
1/4
Cont.P.(MD)No.2248 of 2024
ORDER
This Contempt Petition has been filed complaining that the order passed by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.8521 of 2024 dated 12.06.2024 has not been complied with.
closed.
22.11.2024
ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No.
2/4
Cont.P.(MD)No.2248 of 2024
To
Mr.S.Karunakaran, The Inspector of Police, Nagudi Police Station, Pudukkottai District.
3/4
Cont.P.(MD)No.2248 of 2024
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
ogy
Cont.P.(MD)No.2248 of 2024
22.11.2024
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the police respondent complied with the Court's order dated 12.06.2024 in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.8521 of 2024.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manjula
S.Karunakaran, The Inspector of Police, Nagudi Police Station, Pudukkottai District
B.Pugalendhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
