K.Aynkara Arumuga Vel v. P.P.C.Sudharsan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court closed the second contempt petition filed by the petitioner alleging willful disobedience of an earlier order. The Court observed that the same grounds were raised in a prior petition which was dismissed after recording evidence of compliance, rendering the current petition inadmissible.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner to bear Rs.5,000 as costs to the Legal Services Authority.
What the court decided
Cont.P.(MD) No.164 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.02.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
CONT.P.(MD)No.164 of 2024
in
W.P.(MD)No.26841 of 2022
K.Aynkara Arumuga Vel ... Petitioner
-vs-
1.P.P.C.Sudharsan, S/o. Chidambaram, No.2/2178-1, Devi Nagar, Sithurajapuram Via,
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a second contempt petition can be entertained when a prior petition on identical grounds was already closed.
Whether the respondents committed willful disobedience of the order dated 12.12.2022 regarding temple renovation permissions.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Aynkara Arumuga Vel
- respondent
P.P.C.Sudharsan
- respondent
A.S.P.T.Maheswaran
- respondent
S.Baskaran
- respondent
G.Senthilrajan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court