Balu v. Manikandan
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging that respondents commenced work without a survey contrary to court orders. The matter was reported by the respondent's counsel as having been stopped. The Court recorded the submission and closed the contempt petition.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition stands closed following the report that the work has been stopped.
What the court decided
Cont.P(MD)No.114 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 07.02.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
Cont.P(MD)No.114 of 2024 in W.P(MD)No.22834 of 2022
Balu
... Petitioner/Petitioner
vs.
1.Manikandan, The Tahsildar, Papanasam Taluk, Thanjavur District.
2.Rajan The Block Development Officer, Block Development Office, Ammapettai, Thanajvur District.
... Contemnor/Respondent
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Balu
- respondent
Manikandan
- respondent
Rajan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court