M.Prakash v. a.Karthick
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition filed for wilful disobedience of a previous order, the petitioner submitted that the order had been complied with. The court recorded this statement and closed the petition without adjudicating on the merits of the alleged disobedience.
What did the court decide?
The court closed the contempt petition upon the recorded statement that the impugned order was complied with.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.(MD) No.1007 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 23.10.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
Cont.P.(MD) No.1007 of 2024 in W.P.(MD) No.11723 of 2019
M.Prakash
... Petitioner
-vs-
1.Dr.A.Karthick
Government of Tamil Nadu rep.by its Principal Secretary Department of Higher Education Fort St.George, Secretariat Chennai-600 009
2.S.Karmegam
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be closed upon the submission that the impugned order has been complied with.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. Prakash
- respondent
Dr. A. Karthick
- respondent
Government of Tamil Nadu
- respondent
S. Karmegam
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court