Tmt.K.Rukmani v. Gaayathri
Case brief
What is this about?
A Contempt Petition filed against an Assistant Commissioner of Labour for alleged disobedience of an earlier Madras High Court order was disposed of. The Court observed that the petitioner had substantially complied with the order as several amounts had been received, despite some pending disbursements. The petition was closed.
What did the court decide?
The Contempt Petition is closed as the order dated 11.08.2022 has been substantially complied with.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.944 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.02.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
Cont.P.No.944 of 2023
K.Rukmani, Deputy Inspector of Labour, 78, Dhamu Nagar, SRKV Post, Coimbatore - 641 020.
... Petitioner
versus
Gaayathri, D/o.Subburaj, The Assistant Commissioner of Labour Enforcement, Office of the Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Coimbatore. ...
Respondent
Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondent for her wilful disobedience of the order in W.P.No.14705 of 2021.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has substantially complied with the earlier order dated 11.08.2022 by receiving several pension and leave-related funds, thereby justifying the closure of the Contempt Petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Rukmani
- respondent
Gaayathri
Coram
R.N.MANJULA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court