Contempt petition alleging non-compliance with a writ order dated 11.9.2023. The respondent's counsel submitted that compliance orders were passed on 18.7.2024, 2.8.2024 and 6.8.2024; the petitioner did not dispute this, and the court closed the petition without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.898 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09.08.2024
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.D.KRISHNAKUMAR, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI
Cont.P.No.898 of 2024
V.Elumalai .. Petitioner
Vs
V.Vidyavathi, The Secretary (Tourism), Ministry of Tourism, Government of India, Transport Bhavan, No.1, Parliament Street, New Delhi-110 001. .. Respondent
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent for deliberately committing contempt by willful disobedience of the order dated 11.9.2023 passed in W.P.No.30829 of 2019.
For the Petitioner : Mr.P.Ayyamperumal For the Respondent : Mr.R.Rajesh Vivekanandan Dy. Solicitor-General
___________ Page 1 of 4_
Cont.P.No.898 of 2024
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice)
Alleging non-compliance of the order dated 11.9.2023
passed in W.P.No.30829 of 2019, the petitioner has filed this contempt petition.
and the same was communicated to the petitioner.
Solicitor General is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner.
___________ Page 2 of 4_
Cont.P.No.898 of 2024
In view of the submission made by learned counsel on either side that the order of this court has been complied with,
the contempt petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
(D.K.K., ACJ.) (P.B.B, J.) 09.08.2024 Index : No NC : No sasi
___________ Page 3 of 4_
Cont.P.No.898 of 2024
THE HON'BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND P.B.BALAJI, J.
(sasi)
Cont.P.No.898 of 2024
09.08.2024
___________ Page 4 of 4_
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the directions in the order dated 11.9.2023 in W.P.No.30829 of 2019 had been complied with, justifying closure of the contempt petition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V.Elumalai
V.Vidyavathi, The Secretary (Tourism), Ministry of Tourism, Government of India
D.Krishnakumar
P.B.Balaji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
