Disposal of a contempt petition challenging an order in WP.No.3469 of 2023. The Court held that having considered the petitioner's representations, the substantive issue is closed, and the petitioner must establish rights through proper civil proceedings.
The Court directed the petitioner to establish her rights in the manner known to law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.746 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20.03.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR Cont.P.No. 746 of 2024
Arulmathy Mercy .. Petitioner
Versus
T.Varalaskhmi Tahsildar Velachery Taluk Chennai – 600 042 Respondent
Prayer: Contempt Petition filed section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order of this court dated 08.02.2023 in WP.No.3469 of 2023.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ravi For Respondents : Mr.P.Balathandayutham Special Government Pleader
ORDER
This contempt petition has been filed seeking to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the Order of this Court dated 08.02.2023 in WP.No.3469 of 2023
1/2
Cont.P.No.746 of 2024
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
20.03.2024
Internet : Yes Index : Yes / No dhk
Cont.P.No.746 of 2024
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to punishment in contempt for not complying with the order dated 08.02.2023.
Arulmathy Mercy
T. Varalaskhmi
N. Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
