Mr.Smikannu v. Tmt. K.M.Sarayu
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a contempt petition for wilful disobedience of a Court order. Respondents provided an affidavit showing inspection found no encroachment, leading to closure of the petition.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition stands closed due to the affidavit on record showing no encroachment.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont. P. No.2641 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.10.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
Cont. P. No.2641 of 2024
Samikannu
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.Tmt. K.M.Sarayu, The District Collector, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District.
2.Thiru. H.S. Srikanth, The Commissioner of Corporation, Corporation Office at Hosur, Krishnagiri District.
3.Ms. A. Priyanka, The Sub Collector, Office of Sub Collector, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Samikannu
- respondent
Tmt. K.M.Sarayu
- respondent
Thiru. H.S. Srikanth
- respondent
Ms. A. Priyanka
- respondent
Thiru. Vijaykumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · P.b. Balaji Acting
- Order 2 · S. M. Subramaniam Mohammed Shaffiq
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court