R.Kuppan v. Dr.D.Karthikeyan, Ias.
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, the petitioner sought punishment for respondents' alleged non-compliance with a prior order. The respondents submitted compliance with calculation details regarding TDS and Insurance Premium. The court is satisfied and closed the petition, directing furnishing of details.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition is closed; respondents are directed to furnish calculation details regarding TDS and Insurance Premium to the petitioner.
What the court decided
Cont.P.No.2637 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.12.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
Cont.P.No.2637 of 2024
R.Kuppan
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.Dr.D.Karthikeyan, IAS,
Principal Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and Water Supplies Department,
Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.
2.Dr.J.Radhakrishnan, IAS,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be closed given the submission that the previous order has been complied with.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Kuppan
- respondent
Dr.D.Karthikeyan
- respondent
Dr.J.Radhakrishnan
- respondent
C.Lawrence
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court