Dismissed

Mr.R.N.David Mariyanayagam v. Mr. R.Arivazhagan

Madras HC12 Nov 2024CONT P/2598/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appearing para by para, this order dismisses a contempt petition for willful disobedience. The court accepts the government advocate's submission that compliance order was passed. The petitioner is allowed to challenge any recovery order made contrary to the writ. Agenda item closed.

What did the court decide?

Contempt Petition closed; liberty granted to challenge recovery proceedings inconsistent with the writ order.

Mr.R.N.David Mariyanayagam Vs Mr. R.Arivazhagan — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Cont.P.No.2598 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 12.11.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA

¶6

Cont.P.No.2598 of 2024

¶7

R.N.David Maria Nayagam ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

Mr.R.Arivazhagan The Chief Educational Officer, The Office of the Chief Educational Officer, Villupuram, Villupuram District 605 602. ... Respondent

¶10

Prayer: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order passed in W.P.No.15274 of 2020 dated 06.02.2024.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Johnson

¶12

For Respondent : Mr.A.M.Ayyadurai, GA

¶13

ORDER

¶14

This Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondent for

¶15

willful disobedience of the order passed in W.P.No.15274 of 2020 dated

¶16

06.02.2024.

¶17

Page No.1 of 4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

Cont.P.No.2598 of 2024

¶20

2 . When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned

¶21

Government Advocate submitted that in pursuant to the order passed in the above Writ Petition on 06.02.2024, an order has been passed on 16.09.2024 by complying the order of this Court.

¶22

3. However, the grievance of the petitioner is that the consequent

¶23

monetary benefit has not been disbursed. On the other hand, some recovery order has been issued.

¶24

4. If recovery order, if any, is passed in contrary to the order of the

¶25

third respondent, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the recovery proceedings.

¶26

5. In view of the same, this Contempt Petition is closed.

¶27

12.11.2024

¶28

Index : Yes /No Internet : Yes/No Speaking / Non-speaking gsk

¶29

Page No.2 of 4

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

Cont.P.No.2598 of 2024

¶32

¶33

Mr.R.Arivazhagan The Chief Educational Officer, The Office of the Chief Educational Officer, Villupuram, Villupuram District 605 602.

¶34

Page No.3 of 4

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

Cont.P.No.2598 of 2024

¶37

R.N.MANJULA, J.

¶38

gsk

¶39

Cont.P.No.2598 of 2024

¶40

12.11.2024

¶41

Page No.4 of 4

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Mr.R.N.David Mariyanayagam v. Mr. R.Arivazhagan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr.R.N.David Mariyanayagam v. Mr. R.Arivazhagan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Special Tahsildar Vs Kamatchiammal Deceased

Paramasivam Vs Soundarajan

N.Shankaran Vs a.Valliammal

S.C.Rajendran Vs the United India Insurance Co.

M.Nanjappan Vs Poovathal @ Masammal

Settiyanna Gounder(Died) Vs Arivalagan