M.Dakshinamurthy v. Mr. Senthilkumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners filed contempt petitions against Sub-Registrar for alleged disobedience of court orders. The respondent stated the document would be released within a week, leading to closure of the petitions.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petitions closed due to respondent's undertaking to release documents.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.Nos.2029, 2157, 2159 & 2160 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 13.12.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
Cont.P.Nos.2029, 2157, 2159 & 2160 of 2024
S.Dakshinamurthy ... Petitioner in Cont.P.No.2029 of 2024 B.Murugan ... Petitioner in Cont.P.No.2157 of 2024 A.Rajkumar ... Petitioner in Cont.P.No.2159 of 2024 M.Dakshinamurthy ... Petitioner in Cont.P.No.2160 of 2024
Vs.
Senthilkumar, Sub-Registrar, Perambakkam Sub-Registrar Office, Thiruvallur District. ... Respondent
Contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for his willful disobedience to the orders of this Court dated 10.04.2024 passed in W.P.Nos.31080, 31083, 31085 & 31087 of 2019.
1/4
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Dakshinamurthy
- petitioner
B.Murugan
- petitioner
A.Rajkumar
- petitioner
M.Dakshinamurthy
- respondent
Senthilkumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court