M.Karthika v. Shankar Jiwal, I.P.S., and another
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court held that a delay in issuing an order rejecting compassionate appointment, pending a Tahsildar's report, did not amount to willful disobedience. The contempt petition was closed, leaving the petitioner to challenge the rejection order in the manner known to law.
What the court decided
Cont.P.No.1806 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.08.2024
Coram
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Cont.P.No.1806 of 2024
M.Karthika ... Petitioner
-Versus-
1.Mr.Shankar Jiwal, I.P.S, The Director General of Police, Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004.
2.P.Ravichandran, Commandant, TSP III Battalion, Veerapuram, Avadi, Chennai – 600 055. ... Respondents
Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience to the order of this Court dated 16.06.2023 passed in W.P.No.23266 of 2013.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Sivakumar
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents willfully disobeyed the earlier order of the Court by delaying the compassionate appointment?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Karthika
- respondent
Mr.Shankar Jiwal, I.P.S, The Director General of Police
- respondent
P.Ravichandran, Commandant, TSP III Battalion
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court