K.Pakkirisamy v. Shankar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a contempt petition for wilful disobedience of the order dated 16.09.2022. The Court found that the Respondent had complied with the direction by making a payment via Indian Overseas Bank, as evidenced by a bank communication. Contempt petition was closed without costs.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Petition closed; no costs awarded.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Contempt Petition No.1761 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16.04.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR
Contempt Petition No.1761 of 2023
K.Pakkrisamy
Petitioner
Vs
Shankar, The Regional Director Employees State Insurance Corporation Chennai-34 Respondent
Prayer:- This Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the Respondent for the wilful disobedience of the order dated of this Court, dated 16.09.2022, passed in WP.No.33559 of 2016.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Respondent has complied with the direction of this Court in WP.No.33559 of 2016.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Pakkrisamy
- respondent
Shankar
Coram
S.S.SUNDAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court