K.M.Sunny v. a.Karpagam
Case brief
What is this about?
Special Leave Pleader submitted that the order in W.P. No. 930 of 2024 was complied with. The contempt petition was closed with liberty to work out remedy as the delay in compliance was excused due to post-operational step.
What did the court decide?
Petition closed, liberty granted to petitioners to work out remedy.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.1431 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 16.07.2024
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
Contempt Petition No. 1431 of 2024
1.K.M.Sunny 2.K.M.Mohan 3.R.Premkumar Reddy 4.R.Rajkumar Reddy ... Petitioners
Vs.
Mrs.A.Karpagam Revenue Divisional Officer Bharathiyar Street SP Nagar, Kakkalur Thiruvallur District – 602 003. ... Respondent
Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for disobeying the orders of this Court dated 18.01.2024 passed in W.P.No.930 of 2024.
For Petitioners : Ms.R.Maheswari For Respondent : Mr.A.Selvendran Special Government Pleader
Page No.1/3
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent has complied with the order dated 18.01.2024 issued in W.P. No. 930 of 2024.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.M. Sunny
- petitioner
K.M. Mohan
- petitioner
R. Premkumar Reddy
- petitioner
R. Rajkumar Reddy
- respondent
Mrs. A. Karpagam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court