Y.Mohan v. Mr.Srinivasa Perumal, and 3 others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought punishment for non-disposal of a representation to remove his name from the Police History Sheet. Court noted the petitioner was informed of pending case reasons for retention and found no basis for contempt.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Petition closed as no survival of the petition exists.
What the court decided
Cont.P.No.1289 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.07.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
Cont.P.No.1289 of 2024
Y.Mohan
.. Petitioner
/versus/
1.Srinivasa Perumal,
The Superintendent of Police, Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur
- 2.Vignesh,
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruttani, Thiruvallur District
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is guilty of contempt for not having his representation on the History Sheet disposed of within the stipulated time.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Y.Mohan
- respondent
Srinivasa Perumal
- respondent
Vignesh
- respondent
Rukmagandan
- respondent
Elango
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court