The Official Liquidator v. M/s.Royal Thai Embassy
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2018 in C.P.No.255 of 2014 Krishnan…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Comp.A.No.222 of 2018 in C.P.No.255 of 2014
Krishnan Ramasamy, J.,
Ms.B.Ambili, Deputy Official Liquidator submitted that for initiating
proceedings against respondent/Royal Thai Embassy, she is yet to get permission from the Ministry of External Affairs.
2. Considering the submission made by the Deputy Official Liquidator, this Court is of the view that, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this application pending from the year of 2018, without any further progress. Therefore, this Company Application is closed. Once the permission from the Ministry of External Affairs for initiating proceedings is obtained, the Deputy Official Liquidator is granted liberty to file fresh application, for recovery of claim from respondent/Royal Thai Embassy.
07.06.2024
jd
1/2
Krishnan Ramasamy, J., j d
Comp.A.No.222 of 2018 in C.P.No.255 of 2014
07.06.2024
2/2
Deputy Official Liquidator
Royal Thai Embassy
Krishnan Ramasamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court