Allowed

Scm Silks Private Limited v. nil

Madras HC6 Sept 2024COMP.A/145/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicant sought a direction to the Registry to transmit a certified copy of the court's demerger scheme order to the Sub Registrar, Ernakulam so the scheme could be registered and revenue records mutated. Relying on Section 89(5) of the Registration Act as amended by Kerala, the Court directed transmission within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Registry directed to send certified copy of the order dated 18.07.2011 in CP.Nos.280-287/2010 to the Sub Registrar, Ernakulam within four weeks.

Scm Silks Private Limited Vs nil — Company and Corporate | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Comp.A.No.145 of 2024 in CP.No.286 of 2010

¶2

K. KUMARESH BABU, J.,

¶3

This application has been filed to direct the Registry of this Court to send a copy of the order dated 18.07.2011 passed in CP.Nos.280 to 287 of 2010 along

¶4

with the sanctioned scheme to the jurisdictional Registrar namely Sub Registrar, Ernakulam at Sub Registrar's Office, 2^nd Floor, Perumpilly Building Opp.Maharaja's College Ground, Ernakulam – 682 001 for entry in Book No.1 maintained by the Jurisdictional Registrar in respect of property situated in Ernakulam Kerala.

¶5

The learned counsel for the applicant would submit that pursuant to the scheme for demerger which had been sanctioned by this Court by an order dated 18.07.2011 made in CP.Nos.280 to 287 of 2010, resulting the applicant company being incorporated and was vested with certain properties and Schedule-5 to the schedule of demerger.

¶6

The applicant who approached the revenue authorities seeking for mutation of revenue records which was disposed of by the revenue authority calling upon the applicant to take necessary steps to produce the scheme of demerger and get the same registered as per rules prevailing in the State of Kerala.

¶7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶8

1/4

¶9

The learned counsel for the applicant also produced the copy of

¶10

Registration Act 1908 as amended by the State of Kerala. For better appreciation, the relevant provision is extracted hereunder :-

¶11

“ 89. Copies of certain orders, certificates and

¶12

instruments to be sent to registering officers and filed :-

¶13

(5)Every Court passing -

¶14

(a) any decree or order creating, declaring,

¶15

transferring, limiting or extinguishing any right, title or interest to or in immovable property in favour of any person,

¶16

¶17

(b)an order for the attachment of immovable

¶18

property or for the release of any immovable from

¶19

attachment,

¶20

shall send a copy of such decree or order together with a

¶21

memorandum describing the property as far as may be practicable in the manner required by Section 21, to the Registering Officer within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the whole or any part of the immovable property comprised in such decree or order is situate, and such officer

¶22

shall file the copy and memorandum in his Book No.1.”

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

2/4

¶25

Therefore, the present application has been filed to send a copy of the order dated 18.07.2011 passed in CP.Nos.280 to 287 of 2010. Considering the submissions so made by the learned counsel for the applicant and also pursuant to the provisions of Section 89(5) of the Registration Act, 1908 amended by the State of Kerala and that view of the specific provisions which had been extracted supra, I am of the view that it is impediment on the Registry of this Court to send a copy of the order dated 18.07.2011 passed in CP.Nos.280 to 287 of 2010 to the Sub Registrar, Ernakulam at Sub Registrar's Office, 2^nd Floor, Perumpilly Building Opp.Maharaja's College Ground, Ernakulam – 682 001 or otherwise the scheme of demerger order of this Court cannot be fully effectuated.

¶26

In the result, this application is ordered by directing the Registry to send a certified copy of this Court order dated 18.07.2011 passed in CP.Nos.280 to 287 of 2010 to the Sub Registrar, Ernakulam at Sub Registrar's Office, 2^nd Floor, Perumpilly Building Opp.Maharaja's College Ground, Ernakulam – 682 001, within a period of four weeks from today.

¶27

06.09.2024.

¶28

tsh

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

3/4

¶31

K. KUMARESH BABU, J. tsh

¶32

Comp.A.No.145 of 2024 in CP.No.286 of 2010

¶33

06.09.2024.

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

4/4

Scm Silks Private Limited v. nil

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Scm Silks Private Limited v. nil

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Co. Ltd. Vs Rakesh Rathore

Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Co. Ltd. Vs Samuvel Raj G and another

Laqshya Media Limited Vs The Commissioner

Elangovan M Vs Government of Puducherry

Kondala Rao Balusu Vs Prodapt Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

M.M.Gupta Vs M/S Maars Software International Ltd.