Company applications in a pending company petition were listed for dismissal for non-representation. The applicant's counsel stated the applications had become infructuous; the Court closed them accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Comp.A.Nos.121 and 122 of 2016
Comp.A.Nos.121 and 122 of 2016 in C.P.No.54 of 2015
C.SARAVANAN, J.
These cases are listed under the caption “For Dismissal” as there was no representation on behalf of the applicant on an earlier occasion i.e., on 16.02.2024.
for the applicant is present and submits that these applications have become infructuous.
Applications are closed as infructuous.
22.03.2024
arb
1/1
C. Saravanan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
