Pandi v. v.Kamachi(Died)
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court allowed a Civil Miscellaneous petition seeking to restore an appeal dismissed for default. The court found no objection from the appearing respondents and directed the registry to list the matter as requested.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Miscellaneous petition stands allowed and the appeals is directed to be listed on 07.03.2024.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
Friday, the First day of March Two Thousand and Twenty Four
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P. DHANABAL
CMP(MD). No.8596 of 2022 in AS(MD).No.189 of 2011
1. Pandi 2. Muthuraman 3. Pothumponnu 4. Karthick ... Petitioners/Appellants
Vs 1 V.Kamachi(Died) .. 1st Respondent 2 Kathaiah 3 Rengan 4 Ganesan (Died) 5 Kamalam 6 Angammal(Died) 7 Vasanthal 8 Amirtham @ Pothumponnu, 9 Mangayee .. Respondents No.2 to 9/ Respondents No.2 to 9 10 Shanthi 11 Kannadasan 12 Thirunavukarasu 13 Santhya .. Respondents No.10 to 13 (Respondents No.10 to 13 are brought on record as LRS of the deceased 4th respondent vide Court order dated 15.03.2023 made in CMP(MD). No.1967/2023 in AS(MD).No.189/2011)
1/4
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to restore the appeal dismissed for default upon the filing of a civil miscellaneous petition and consent from respondents.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Pandi
- appellant
Muthuraman
- respondent
Kathaiah
- respondent
Ganesan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court