Allowed

The Principal Secretary v. Pon Nandagopal

Madras HC5 Dec 2024CMP(MD)/7615/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court disposed of a civil miscellaneous petition. The court condoned a significant delay in filing a writ appeal against an order in a writ petition seeking pension benefits, subject to a condition regarding a fine payment.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of delay of 538 days in the civil miscellaneous petition, conditioned upon payment of Rs. 5,000.

The Principal Secretary Vs Pon Nandagopal — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

CMP(MD) No.7615 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Fifth day of December Two Thousand and Twenty Four

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH and

¶6

The HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.D. MARIA CLETE

¶7

CMP(MD) No.7615 of 2024 in WA(MD) SR No.37587 of 2024

¶8

1 THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TOURISM, CULTURE AND ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, FORT ST.GEORGE, CHENNAI - 9.

¶9

2 THE COMMISSIONER HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GANDHI ADIGAL SALAI, NUNGAMPAKKAM, CHENNAI - 34. ... Petitioners / Appellants

¶10

... Petitioners / Appellants Vs

¶11

PON NANDAGOPAL ... Respondent / Respondent

¶12

Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 538 days in filing the writ appeal against the order dated 14-112022 made in W.P.(MD).No.2254 of 2019 on the file of this Honourable Court.

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

1/3

¶15

CMP(MD) No.7615 of 2024

¶16

Prayer in WA(MD) SR No.37587 of 2024:

¶17

To set aside the order dated 14.11.2022 made in WP(MD) No.2254 of 2019 on the file of this Hon'ble Court and allow the writ appeal.

¶18

Prayer in WP(MD). 2254/ 2019 :

¶19

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the G.O.No.(Pa)No.124 dated 05.12.2018 issued by the 2nd respondent by calling for the records from the 1st respondent and quash the same as illegal consequentially directing the respondents to sanction the Pensionary benefits.

¶20

ORDER : This civil miscellaneous petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.J.ASHOK, Additional Government Pleader for the petitioners and of Mr.R.MURALI, Advocate on behalf of the Respondent, the Court made the following order:-

¶21

Having been satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is allowed and the delay is condoned on condition that the petitioners pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) to the credit of Account No.10767823177 (State Bank of India) towards District Siddha Medical Officer, CCRI, Periyakulam.

¶22

sd/05/12/2024

¶23

/ TRUE COPY /

¶24

/12/2024 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.I /II /III /IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶25

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

2/3

¶28

CMP(MD) No.7615 of 2024

¶29

¶30

1 THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TOURISM, CULTURE AND ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, FORT ST.GEORGE, CHENNAI - 9.

¶31

2 THE COMMISSIONER HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GANDHI ADIGAL SALAI, NUNGAMPAKKAM, CHENNAI - 34.

¶32

COPY TO:

¶33

THE DISTRICT SIDDHA MEDICAL OFFICER, CCRI, PERIYAKULAM.

¶34

+1 CC to M/s.SPL.GP ( SR-71938[F] dated 09/12/2024 )

¶35

ORDER IN CMP(MD) No.7615 of 2024 in WA(MD) SR No.37587 of 2024 Date :05/12/2024

¶36

ED/VR /SAR- (13/12/2024) 3P / 5 C

¶37

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

3/3

The Principal Secretary v. Pon Nandagopal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Principal Secretary v. Pon Nandagopal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Government of Tamil Nadu, Vs AnnathanaChathiram Sachidhanatham Swamy Madam

The Government of Tamil Nadu, Vs AnnathanaChathiram Sachidhanatham Swamy Madam

S.Nachimuthu Vs The District Collector

T. Ramanigopaal, Vs The Commissioner of Land Administration

The Commissioner Vs Raman @ Ondachi Poosari

The Managing Director Vs P.Marimuthu