Brindha v. M.Arunachalam
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a petition seeking to dispense with production of a certified copy of a judgment and decree, holding that the petitioner could obtain and produce the copy.
What did the court decide?
No relief granted; petitioner directed to obtain and produce the certified copy.
What the court decided
CMP(MD) No.4217 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Tenth day of June Two Thousand and Twenty Four
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN
CMP(MD) No.4217 of 2024 in SA(MD)SR.No.7982 of 2024
BRINDHA ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT/3rd PARTY
Vs
1 M.ARUNACHALAM
2 THE TAHSILDAR THOOTHUKUDI, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.
3 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to dipsense with the production of certified copy of the Judgemnt and decree dated 24.10.2019 passed in A.S.No. 27 of 2019 passed by the Principal District Judge, Thoothukudi and O.S.No. 163/2014 dated 01.08.2018 passed by the Honourable Sub Judge, Thoothukudi and thus render justice.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
BRINDHA
- respondent
1 M.ARUNACHALAM
- respondent
2 THE TAHSILDAR THOOTHUKUDI
- respondent
3 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court