Rani v. Bhuvaneswari
Case brief
What is this about?
The court clarified that the petitioner complied with the cost payment condition in CRP(MD)No.2285 of 2018, allowing the revision petition and directing the trial court to entertain the relevant IA. It dismissed the initial communication dismissing the petition.
What did the court decide?
Clarification that the petitioner complied with the cost condition; CRP(MD)No.2285 of 2018 allowed; Trial court to entertain I.A.No.1 of 2023.
What the court decided
CMP(MD). No.4124 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
Friday, the Twenty Second day of March Two Thousand and Twenty Four
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C. KUMARAPPAN
CMP(MD). No.4124 of 2024 in CRP(MD).No.2285 of 2018
Rani ... Petitioner/Petitioner
..Vs..
Bhuvaneswari ... Respondent/Respondent
Prayer :-
Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed U/s.151 of C.P.C to pass an order of Clarification to clarify the order dated 02.08.2023 made in CRP(MD)No.2285 of 2018 on the file of this Court and consequently to pass suitable direction to the learned District Munsif court, Paramakudi for entertaining the I.A.No.1 of 2023 in O.S.No.9 of 2013.
Prayer in CRP(MD)No.2285 of 2018:
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner complied with the condition of cost payment in the impugned order despite submitting acknowledgment to the wrong court.
Whether the directions in the impugned order regarding dismissal of the revision petition stand repealed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rani
- respondent
Bhuvaneswari
Coram
C. KUMARAPPAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court