Malarkodi v. Kalanesan
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners sought condonation of 344 days' delay in filing a second appeal. Counsel reported settlement before Lok Adalat; the Court closed the petition and rejected the second appeal at SR stage, directing refund of court fee per Rules.
What the court decided
S.A(MD)No.SR88139 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 03.06.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN
C.M.P(MD)No.2962 of 2020 in
S.A(MD)No.SR88139 of 2019
- 1.Malarkodi
- 2.Minor.Hari Sankardoss
(Represented by Mother / Natural Guardian
- 1st Appellant)
... Petitioners / Appellants
Vs
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Malarkodi
- appellant
Minor.Hari Sankardoss
- respondent
Kalanesan
- respondent
Residential Medical Officer Government Hospital, Aranthangi
- respondent
The Deputy Director Health Science, Pudukkottai
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court