Allowed

S. Maheswari, v. The Managing Director

Madras HC6 Feb 2024CMP(MD)/1876/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interim application in a motor accident claims appeal seeking permission to withdraw 50% of the compensation amount deposited in the tribunal. The High Court, satisfied with the affidavit's reasons, allowed the petition and directed the appeal to be listed on 05.04.2024.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners permitted to withdraw 50% of the amount deposited to the credit of M.C.O.P.No.839 of 2016 before the MACT, Tiruchirappalli.

S. Maheswari, Vs The Managing Director — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

CMP(MD) No.1876 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Sixth day of February Two Thousand and Twenty Four

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice S.SRIMATHY CMP(MD) No.1876 of 2023 and CMA(MD) No.374 of 2022

¶6

1 MAHESWARI, 2 R.SATHYAMURTHI, 3 S.RAJARAJESWARI, ... PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS

¶7

¶8

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, TAMILNADU STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION LIMITED, KUMBAKONAM (DIVISION), HAVING ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT PERYAMILAGUPARAI, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI - 01 ... RESPONDENT/APPELLANT

¶9

Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners to withdraw the 50 percentage of the amount deposited to the credit of M.C.O.P.No.839 of 2016 on the file of the MACT (Special District Judge) Tiruchirappalli.

¶10

Prayer in CMA(MD) No.374 of 2022 :

¶11

To set aside the impugned award passed in M.C.O.P.No.839 of 2016 dated 26.11.2019 on the file of the MACT (Special District Judge), Tiruchirapalli.

¶12

ORDER : This Civil Miscellaneous petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.R.RAJARAMAN, Advocate for the petitioners and of MR.P.M.VISHNUVARTHANAN, Advocate on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶13

The petitioners had filed this petition to withdraw the 50% of the amount https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

1/2

¶15

CMP(MD) No.1876 of 2023

¶16

deposited to the credit of M.C.O.P.No.839 of 2016 on the file of the MACT (Special

¶17

District Judge), Tiruchirappalli.

¶18

2.Being satisfied with the reason stated in the affidavit filed in support of this

¶19

petition, the civil miscellaneous petition is allowed.

¶20

3.Post the case on 05.04.2024.

¶21

sd/06/02/2024 / TRUE COPY /

¶22

04/04/2024

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶24

¶25

THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL (SPECIAL DISTRICT JUDGE), TIRUCHIRAPPALLI.

¶26

+1 CC to M/s.R.RAJARAMAN, Advocate ( SR-1460[I] dated 06/02/2024 )

¶27

ORDER IN CMP(MD) No.1876 of 2023 and CMA(MD) No.374 of 2022 Date :06/02/2024

¶28

RS/JGB/SAR-(04.04.2024) 2P 3C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

2/2

S. Maheswari, v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S. Maheswari, v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

United India Insurance Company Ltd., Vs J.Shanmugananthan

Royal Sundaram Allianz Insurance Co. Ltd., Vs T. Thavethu

Kamala Vs v.Ashokkumar

Ayyanan Vs v.Alagar

Manikandan Vs Narayanan

P.K.Ayyoob, Vs Sarammal