Allowed

The Branch manager v. K.Sathiya

Madras HC13 Nov 2024CMP(MD)/12019/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Insurance company sought condonation of 176 days' delay in filing an appeal against a motor accident claims award. The court allowed the petition subject to payment of Rs.500 as costs to the High Court Legal Services Committee within two weeks, failing which the petition would stand dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 176 days condoned conditionally on payment of Rs.500 costs to High Court Legal Services Committee within two weeks.

The Branch manager Vs K.Sathiya — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

C.M.P.(MD)No.12019 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Thirteenth day of November Two Thousand and Twenty Four

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R. KALAIMATHI

¶6

C.M.P.(MD)No.12019 of 2024 in C.M.A.(MD) SR.No.56458 of 2024

¶7

THE BRANCH MANAGER M/S.CHOLAMANDALAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., NO.41, 2ND FLOOR, TAB COMPLEX, BARADHIDASAN SALAI, TRICHY. ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT Vs

¶8

1 K.SATHIYAA,

¶9

2 SATHISHKUMAR ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶10

Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 176 days in filing the above appeal against the award dated 21.09.2023 made in MCOP.No.141/2020 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Special Sub Judge), Trichirapalli and render justice.

¶11

PRAYER IN C.M.A.(MD) SR.No.56458 of 2024:

¶12

Pleased to set aside the Award passed in MCOP.No.141 of 2020 on the file of https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Special Sub Judge) Tiruchirappalli dated

¶13

1/3

¶14

C.M.P.(MD)No.12019 of 2024

¶15

21.09.2023 and allow the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

¶16

ORDER : This Civil Miscellaneous Petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.K.R.SHIVASHANKARI, Advocate for the petitioner, the court made the following order:-

¶17

This petition is filed to condone the delay of 176 days in filing the above appeal in C.M.A.(MD)SR.No.56458 of 2024.

¶18

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant.

¶19

Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this

¶20

petition, this petition shall be allowed on the payment of costs of Rs.500/- to the High Court Legal Services Committee attached to this Bench, within a period of two weeks from to-day. Failing which, this petition shall stand dismissed, without reference to this Court.

sd/13/11/2024

/ TRUE COPY /

/11/2024

Sub-Assistant Registrar ( C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶25

APD TO

¶26

THE SPECIAL SUBORDINATE JUDGE, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI.

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

2/3

¶29

C.M.P.(MD)No.12019 of 2024

¶30

COPY TO: THE OFFICER INCHARGE, LEGAL AID SERVICE COMMITTEE, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶31

ORDER IN C.M.P.(MD)No.12019 of 2024 in C.M.A.(MD) SR.No.56458 of 2024 Date :13/11/2024

¶32

SA/GSV/SAR. /19.11.2024/3P/3C

¶33

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023.

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

3/3

The Branch manager v. K.Sathiya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Branch manager v. K.Sathiya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Selvakumar,S/O.Late. Vs S.Saranya

Divisional Manager, Vs M.Mohammed Sheik Kadiar

Dhanakodeeswari Vs N.Vellaisamy

The Branch Manager Vs K. Subramani

The Branch Manager Vs P.Saroja

P.Thiyagaraj Vs D.Mariyappan