Allowed

G.Radhakrishnan v. K.Ganapathy

Madras HC28 Oct 2024CMP(MD)/11474/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court allowed an interim prayer permitting the appellant to withdraw the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, which was deposited by the insurance respondent, while the appeal regarding quantum enhancement remains pending.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed; Petitioner permitted to withdraw deposited amount by filing application before the Tribunal; Appeal adjourned for six weeks.

G.Radhakrishnan Vs K.Ganapathy — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

C.M.P.(MD)No.11474 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶3

Monday, the Twenty Eighth day of October Two Thousand and Twenty Four

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice SUNDER MOHAN

¶6

C.M.P.(MD)No.11474 of 2024 in C.M.A.(MD) No.211 of 2024

¶7

G.RADHAKRISHNAN ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT

¶8

¶9

1 K.GANAPATHY

¶10

2 THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, MADURAI ROAD, VIRUDHUNAGAR. ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶11

Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to Withdraw the award amount with interest deposited by the 2nd respondent in M.C.O.P No.89 of 2020 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Sub Court) Virudhunager, pending disposal of the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and thus render justice.

¶12

Prayer in CMA(MD). 211/ 2024 :

¶13

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicle Act to set aside the judgment and decree made in M.C.O.P.No.89 of 2020 on the file of the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Sub Court),Virudhunagar dated 25-09-2023 and

¶14

1/3

¶15

C.M.P.(MD)No.11474 of 2024

¶16

allow the civil miscellaneous appeal and thus render justice.

¶17

ORDER : This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.G.GANESH KUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.V.KARTHIKEYAN, Advocate for the 1^st Respondent and M/s.P.MALINI, Advocate on behalf of the 2^nd Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶18

This petition is filed to permit the petitioner to withdraw the award amount with interest deposited by the second respondent.

¶19

The petitioner/claimant has filed the appeal seeking enhancement. The

¶20

second respondent has not challenged the quantum of compensation. Hence, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the amount deposited by the second respondent

¶21

by filing suitable application before the Tribunal. Hence, this petition is allowed.

¶22

Post the appeal for final hearing after six weeks.

sd/28/10/2024

/ TRUE COPY /

/11/2024

Sub-Assistant Registrar ( C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶27

APD TO

¶28

THE SUBORDINATE JUDGE, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, VIRUDHUNAGAR.

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

2/3

¶31

C.M.P.(MD)No.11474 of 2024

¶32

ORDER IN C.M.P.(MD)No.11474 of 2024 in C.M.A.(MD) No.211 of 2024 Date :28/10/2024

¶33

SA/JGB/SAR. /04.11.2024/3P/2C

¶34

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023.

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

3/3

G.Radhakrishnan v. K.Ganapathy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Radhakrishnan v. K.Ganapathy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Project Director, National Vs R.Pandiselvi

R.Karuppasamy Vs Govindammal

Johnson (Died), 1) Boopathi Vs Abdul Ajees

Kasavan(Owner of the Tractor), Vs Maruthu Muthu

The Divisional Manager Vs Chinnasamy

The Branch Manager, Vs Veerachinnan