This petition sought to condone a 29-day delay in filing a Second Appeal against a judgment and decree. The court found the reasons stated by the petitioner justified and ordered the registry to number the appeal.
Asked to number the Second Appeal if otherwise in order and posted the matter for further proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P. No. 9959 of 2024
in
S.A.SR.No.30529 of 2024
C.M.P. No. 9959 of 2024 in S.A.SR.No.30529 of 2024
T.V. THAMILSELVI, J.
This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 29 days in filing the above Second Appeal against the judgment and decree dated 22.09.2023 passed in A.S.No.43 of 2023, on the file of Subordinate Judge, Ambattur confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.93 of 2005 dated 01.02.2019 on the file of District Munsif Court, Ambattur.
03.06.2024
rpp
C.M.P. No. 9959 of 2024 in S.A.SR.No.30529 of 2024
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
rpp
C.M.P.No. 9959 of 2024 in S.A.SR.. No. 30529 of 2024
03.06.2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay of 29 days in filing the Second Appeal can be condoned based on the appellant's explanation.
T.V. Thamilselvi
Respondent
T.V. Thanisesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
