Petition to condone a 1156-day delay in representing a second appeal, caused when the papers were mixed up with another case bundle and later traced out. The court found the explanation justifiable and allowed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
C.M.P.No. 9550 of 2024 in C.M.P. SR. Nos. 13283 to 13285 of 2016
in S.A. No. 163 of 2005
T.V. THAMILSELVI, J.
This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 1156 days in representing the above petitions in C.M.P. SR.Nos.13283 to 13285 of 2016 in S.A.No.163 of 2005.
27.09.2024
rpp
2
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
rpp
C.M.P.No. 9550 of 2021 in C.M.P.SR.No. 13283 to 13285 of 2016 in S.A. No. 163 of 2005
27.09.2024
(2/4)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 1156 days in representing the Second Appeal papers should be condoned.
Petitioner in C.M.P. SR. Nos. 13283 to 13285 of 2016
T.V. Thamilselvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
