Counsel filed condonation-of-delay petitions for CMA.SR.Nos.9943 & 9949 of 2016. The court dispensed with notice to ex-parte respondents and allowed the petitions, directing registry to number and post the matters for admission.
Petitions allowed; appeals numbered and posted for admission; notice dispensed with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP.No.9546 & 9547 of 2016
CMP.Nos.9546 & 9547 of 2016 in CMA.SR.Nos.9943 & 9949 of 2016
M.DHANDAPANI, J.
These petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 42 days & 43 days in filing the respective appeals.
21.11.2024
skt
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay in filing the respective appeals could be condoned.
Appellee (s)
Respondent(s)
M.DHANDAPANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
