Dismissed
Earikarai Thaikkal Masuthi v. Rajamanicka Gounder
Madras HCCMP/857/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
& 861 of 2023 in S.A.No.454 of 2007…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P. Nos.857,858 & 861 of 2023 in S.A.No.454 of 2007
C.M.P.Nos.857,858 & 861 of 2023
in
S.A. No. 454 of 2007
T.V. THAMILSELVI, J.
These Civil Miscellaneous Petitions have been filed seeking to condone the delay of 3608 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of 4th respondent, and to bring on record the proposed respondents 16 to 18 herein as legal representatives of deceased 4th respondent.
C.M.P. Nos.857,858 & 861 of 2023 in S.A.No.454 of 2007
the reasons assigned in the affidavit and in order to give one more opportunity, all the petitions are allowed on condition that the petitioner shall pay a cost of Rs.3000/- payable to the learned counsel for respondents within a period of one week from the date of receipt of copy of this order. On such payment of cost, the proposed legal representatives of the 3rd respondent are to be impleaded as respondents 16 to 18 in the above Second Appeal. The Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment in the cause title and post the matter on 25.09.2024.
02.09.2024
rpp
C.M.P. Nos.857,858 & 861 of 2023 in S.A.No.454 of 2007
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
rpp
C.M.P.Nos. 857,858 & 861 of 2023 in S.A. No. 454 of 2007
02.09.2024 (2/2)
Petitioner/Appellant
Respondents
T.V. Thamilselvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court