Petitions to implead the legal representatives of the sole respondent in a pending second appeal. The court, noting no objection from the proposed respondents, allowed the petitions and directed the Registry to amend the appeal memorandum and print counsel's name.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.Nos.8156, 8158 and 8159 of 2024 in S.A.No.1958 of 2004
C.KUMARAPPAN,J.
These petitions have been filed to implead the legal representatives of the sole respondent. There is no serious objection on behalf of the proposed respondents. Hence, having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and having satisfied with the averments made in the petition, all these petitions are allowed.
appeal memorandum and also print the name of Mr.K.Vasuvenkat, as counsel for newly added parties.
03.04.2024
(1/2)
ub
1/2
C.KUMARAPPAN,J. ub
C.M.P.Nos.8156, 8158 and 8159 of 2024
15.04.2024 (1/2)
2/2
C.KUMARAPPAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
