Disposed
Vadivel Padayachi v. Kaliaperumal
Madras HCCMP/7959/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2019 in Rev.Appl. SR.No. 26162 of 2019…
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
¶1
C.M.P. No. 7959 of 2019 in Rev.Appl. SR.No. 26162 of 2019
¶2
C.M.P. No. 7959 of 2019
¶3
in Rev.Appl. SR.No. 26162 of 2019
¶4
T.V. THAMILSELVI, J.
¶5
This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 66 days in preferring the above Review Petition as against the judgment and decree passed by this Court in S.A.No.1975 of 2000.
¶6
- Mr.D.Kamatchi, learned counsel for Petitioner/Review Applicant submitted that due to age old ailments for the past 2 ½ years, the petitioner was not able to contact his counsel to take further course of action and only during the second week of February 2019, he gave instructions to file the Second Appeal. However, there is a delay of 66 days in filing the above Review Application arose, which is neither willful nor wanton. Therefore, he filed this petition to condone the delay in filing the above Review Application.
¶7
- Considering the facts and circumstances, and the reasons stated by the petitioner in the affidavit is justifiable one. Accordingly, this court is inclined to allow this petition. Registry is directed to number the Review Application if it is otherwise found to be in order and post the matter today at the end of list.
¶8
20.09.2024
¶9
rpp
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether to condone the delay of 66 days in filing the Review Application/Second Appeal.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Petitioner/Review Applicant
Coram
AI extract
T.V. Thamilselvi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court