Petition to introduce a redemption of mortgage deed as additional evidence in a pending second appeal concerning specific performance of an agreement. The judge, having found the agreement suspicious and denied specific performance, declined to receive the additional documents and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.7337 of 2024 in S.A.No.271 of 2020
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.
Mr.C.Prakasam would try to rely upon the redemption of mortgage deed to substantiate his case. This document had not been filed before the Court below, and sought to be introduced in the Second Appeal seeking the invitation of this Court to exercise the power under Order XLI Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
04.07.2024
mkn2
(2/2)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether additional documents not filed before the court below should be received in second appeal under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V. Lakshminarayanan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
