Petitions to implead the legal representatives of deceased second respondent Mallika in a pending second appeal were allowed without objection, and the Registry was directed to amend the appeal memorandum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.Nos. 6154 to 6156 of 2023 in S.A.No.1100 of 1992
C.KUMARAPPAN,J.
It appears that the second respondent Mallika also died and therefore to implead the legal representatives of deceased Mallika, petitions in C.M.P.Nos.6154 to 6156 of 2023 have been filed. There is no serious objection on behalf of the proposed respondents. Hence, having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and having satisfied with the averments made in the petition, all these petitions are allowed.
appeal memorandum.
03.04.2024
(2/3)
ub
1/2
C.KUMARAPPAN,J.
ub
C.M.P.Nos. 10878, 10888 and 10891 of 2019 in S.A.No.1100 of 1992
03.04.2024 (2/3)
2/2
C.Kumarappan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
