Venba v. The Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
Application to condone 193 days' delay in representing a writ appeal. The court, accepting the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, allowed the application and disposed of it.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 193 days in representing the appeal condoned.
What the court decided
C.M.P.No.6096 of 2024 in W.A.SR.No.98712 of 2023
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE
and J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.
Heard Mr.M.Thamizavel, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.T.K.Saravanan, learned Government Advocate for the non-applicant 1.
This application is filed to condone the delay of 193 days in representing the appeal.
For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the delay of 193 days in representing the appeal is condoned. Accordingly, the application stands allowed and is disposed of.
drm
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 193 days in representing the writ appeal should be condoned?
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Applicant in C.M.P.No.6096 of 2024
- respondent
Non-applicant 1
Coram
The Hon'ble Chief Justice
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court