The court, accepting reasons assigned in an affidavit, condoned the deadline-based delay of 270 days for filing the present appeal to the Insurance Court. The appellant represented an insurance company that did not dispute liability.
Delay of 270 days in filing the appeal was condoned. Notice to respondents 5 and 6 is deemed unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP No.5551 of 2024 in CMA SR No.26572 of 2024
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and R.SAKTHIVEL, J.
(Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN,J.)
The respondents 1 to 4/the claimants, who are on caveat. Mr.Siva Kollappan B, learned counsel appearing for the appellant /Insurance Company would submit that the Insurance Company is not disputing its liability, the Appeal is only on the quantum of compensation. Hence notice to respondents 5 and 6 is deemed unnecessary.
2 . Accepting the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is ordered and the delay of 270 days in filing the Appeal is condoned.
jv
Page No.1/2
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay of 270 days in filing the appeal.
Whether notice to respondents 5 and 6 is necessary given the Insurance Company does not dispute liability.
MR.SIVA KOLLAPPAN B
RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4
R.SUBRAMANIAN
R.SAKTHIVEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
