This is a petition to condone a delay of 298 days in filing a consumer complaint amendment. The court condoned the delay based on the reasons in the affidavit, noted that the appellant is not entitled to interest for this period, and directed registration.
Delay of 298 days condoned; petitioner not entitled to interest for this period; complaint numbered and posted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP. 4953 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12-12-2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
CMP. 4953 of 2024
and CMA.SR.No.24745 of 2024
P.KARTHICK NO.5, VELU NAGAR, KOOTHAPAKKAM, TIRUPPAPULIYUR, CUDDALORE-607 002.
APPELLANT(S)
Vs
M.MOHAMED USMAN
S/O. MOHAMED YUNUS, NO. 25, 4TH ST. PUDHU NAGAR, REDDIYARPALAYAM, PUDUCHERRY-605 010. AND ANOTHER
RESPONDENT(S)
For Appellant(s):
RAMYA V. RAO
For Respondent(s):
R1 - DISPENSED WITH (VIDE COURT ORDER DT.18.11.2024) R-2 DIVISIONAL MANAGER THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO, LTD, DO III FLOOR NO. 179, JN STREET, PUDUCHERRY-605 010. PRIVATE NOTICE
R1 - DISPENSED WITH R2 - SERVED ON 03.12.2024
ORDER
This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 298 days in filing the CMA.
12-12-2024
rli
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 298 days in filing the consumer complaint amendment can be condoned.
Whether interest is applicable for the delayed period after condonation of delay.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.KARTHICK NO.5
M.MOHAMED USMAN AND ANOTHER
M. DHANDAPANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
