The Court dismissed a stay petition filed against an order under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, holding that no stay was necessary as there was no executable award in favor of the respondent.
Stay petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.4180 of 2024 in
1
O.S.A.(CAD) No.20 of 2024
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. AND
R.SAKTHIVEL, J.
(Order of the Court was made by R.Subramanian, J.)
Since the appeal itself is against the order passed under Section 34, where the claim of the appellant on certain heads was rejected, there is no need for grant of any stay, as there is no executable award in favour of the respondent.
2. Hence, this stay petition is dismissed .
[R.S.M., J.] [R.S.V., J.] 04.03.2024
dsa
1 issue framed by the court
Whether stay should be granted against an arbitral award under Section 34 where no executable award exists in favor of the respondent?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R.Subramanian
R.Sakthivel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
