V. Sharmila v. K. Vahap
Case brief
What is this about?
Short administrative order regarding the condonation of delay in filing the Registrar General's report. No substantive legal issue decided.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.3688 of 2024 in
A.S.No.111 of 2024
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and R.SAKTHIVEL, J.
The report of the Registrar General filed pursuant to our order dated 16.04.2024 is accepted. The lapse is condoned.
2. Dispense with is ordered for the present.
(R.S.M., J.) (R.S.V., J.) 25.04.2024
dsa
1/1
Coram
R.SUBRAMANIAN
R.SAKTHIVEL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court