Allowed

T.Somasundaram v. The Secretary to Government

Madras HC21 Nov 2024CMP/3454/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition to condone a 231-day delay in filing a review application against an order in a school education service matter. The Government Pleader raised no serious objection; the court accepted the reasons in the affidavit, condoned the delay and directed the Registry to number the review application for admission.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 231 days condoned; Registry to number the review application if papers are in order and post for admission.

T.Somasundaram Vs The Secretary to Government — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

CMP.No.3454/2023 in Rev.Appl.SR.No.127865/2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 21.11.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. SUNDAR

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP

¶8

CMP.No.3454/2023 in Rev.Appl.SR.No.127865/2022

¶9

1.T.Somasundaram

¶10

2.C.Sekar ... Petitioners

¶11

Vs.

¶12

1.The Secretary to Government School Education Department Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.

¶13

2.The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai.

¶14

3.The Chief Education Officer

¶15

Kancheepuram District.

¶16

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

CMP.No.3454/2023 in Rev.Appl.SR.No.127865/2022

¶19

4.The District Education Officer,

¶20

Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram.

5.K.Thulukanam

6.S.Radhbai

... Respondents

Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Order IV Rule 9[4] of Appellate Side Rules to condone the delay of 231 days in filing the present review application in Review Application SR.No.127865/2022.

¶25

For Petitioners : Mr.S.N.Ravichandran For Respondents : Mr.P.Balathandayutham, Spl.GP

¶26

ORDER

¶27

[Order of the Court was made by S.S.SUNDAR, J.,]

¶28

(1)The above Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to condone the delay of

¶29

231 days in filing the writ appeal.

¶30

(2)Mr.P.Balathandayutham, learned Special Government Pleader accepting

¶31

notice on behalf of respondents 1 to 4 has no serious objection.

¶32

(3)This Court is satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in

¶33

support of the above miscellaneous petition.

¶34

(4)Since the reasons assigned are to the satisfaction of this Court, the

¶35

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

CMP.No.3454/2023 in Rev.Appl.SR.No.127865/2022

¶38

petition is ordered and the delay of 231 days is condoned.

¶39

(5)Registry is directed to number the review application if the papers are

¶40

otherwise in order and post the same for admission.

¶41

[SSSRJ] [SSKJ] 21.11.2024

Internet : Yes

1.The Secretary to Government School Education Department Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.

¶46

2.The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai.

¶47

3.The Chief Education Officer Kancheepuram District.

¶48

4.The District Education Officer, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram.

¶49

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶51

CMP.No.3454/2023 in Rev.Appl.SR.No.127865/2022

¶52

S.S. SUNDAR, J., and SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.

¶53

¶54

CMP.No.3454/2023 in Rev.Appl.SR.No.127865/2022

¶55

21.11.2024

¶56

¶57

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

T.Somasundaram v. The Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Somasundaram v. The Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Mohammed Yacod Vs Deputy Commissioner of Police(Admn.)

Ravichakravarthy Vs the State Human Rights Commission

Seetharaman Vs the State Human Rights Commission