Krishnan v. Muniyammal
Case brief
What is this about?
Conditional order condoning delay in filing second appeal due to rectification of defects and missing court fee, directing registry to number and list matter.
What did the court decide?
Petition to condone delay in filing second appeal allowed; matter to be listed for hearing.
What the court decided
C.M.P.No. 26230 of 2024 in
C.M.P.No.26230 of 2024 in S.A.SR.No. 30559 of 2024
S.A. SR.No. 30559 of 2024
T.V. THAMILSELVI, J.
Challenging the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.14 of 2022, the petitioner preferred the above Second Appeal, however there is a delay of 165 days in representing the above second appeal arose. Hence, the present petition has been filed to condone the delay in representing the second appeal.
- Mr.P.G.Thiyagu, learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the
above Second Appeal was returned for rectifying certain defects as well as for payment of pending court fee on 10.03.2024 and the same was again returned on 10.06.2024. Thereafter, the deficit court fee as well as errors were rectified and represented on 18.09.2024, thereby there is a delay of 165 days arose in representing the above second appeal and the said delay caused is neither willful nor wanton, but for the above said reasons. Accordingly, he has filed the above petition.
C.M.P.No.26230 of 2024 in S.A.SR.No. 30559 of 2024
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the second appeal be condoned?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
Coram
T.V. THAMILSELVI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court