The High Court of Madras allowed the appellant's miscellaneous petition condoning a delay of 212 days in filing the C.M.P. against an ex-parte order, being satisfied with the reasons stated in the supporting affidavit.
The delay of 212 days is condoned and the petition is allowed to proceed against the ex-parte order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP NO. 24888 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-12-2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL CMP NO. 24888 of 2024
IN
CMA SR NO. 112714 OF 2023
The Managing Director TNSTC Ltd., (Villupuram Division), Kanchipuram Region-600002
Appellant(s)
Vs
SELVAM S/o.Ranganathan, Door No.27, 5th Circular Road, Jawahar Nagar, Chennai-82
Respondent(s)
For Appellant(s): Mr.A.Vinothraj For Respondent(s):
ORDER
This miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 212 days in filing the C.M.P. against the exparte order dated 29.02.2024 passed in CMP.26691/2023 in CMA.SR.No.112714/2023.
(J.N.B.,J.) (R.S.V.,J.) 12-12-2024
vsi
J.NISHA BANU, J. and R.SAKTHIVEL,J.
vsi
CMP NO. 24888 of 2024 in CMA SR NO. 112714 OF 2023
12.12.2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 212 days in filing C.M.P. should be condoned.
The Managing Director TNSTC Ltd.
Selvam S/o. Ranganathan
J. Nisha Banu
R. Sakthivel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
