P.Jesygaa v. S.John Jannimax
Case brief
What is this about?
Applications seeking condonation of delays of 31 and 16 days in filing were allowed after the contesting respondent agreed to condone the delay keeping its rights and contentions open.
What did the court decide?
Both condonation-of-delay applications were allowed, contesting respondent's rights and contentions kept open.
What the court decided
C.M.P.Nos.23862 and 23940 of 2024 in O.S.A. (CAD) SR. Nos.119982 and 119981 of 2024
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
(Order of the court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Application (C.M.P.No.23862 of 2024) is for condonation of delay of 31
days. Application (C.M.P.No.23940 of 2024) is for condonation of delay of 16 days.
- Counsel for applicant states respondent Nos.1 to 4 in C.M.P.No.23862 of 2024 and respondent Nos.1 to 3 in C.M.P.No.23940 of 2024 support his case. Only contesting respondent is respondent No.5 in C.M.P.No.23862 of 2024 and respondent No.4 in C.M.P.No.23940 of 2024.
- Shri Abishek Jenasenan, counsel for respondent No.5 in C.M.P.No.23862 of 2024 and respondent No.4 in C.M.P.No.23940 of 2024, states that the delay may be condoned keeping open the rights and contentions of respondent No.5 in C.M.P.No.23862 of 2024 and respondent No.4 in C.M.P.No.23940 of 2024.
These applications are ordered accordingly.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delays of 31 and 16 days in filing the applications should be condoned?
Coram
K.R. Shriram
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court