Murugesan v. Sellappan
Case brief
What is this about?
Application to condone a 478-day delay in filing an appeal. The court, satisfied with the reasons in the supporting affidavit, allowed the petition and directed the Registry to number the appeal and list it for admission.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 478 days in filing the appeal condoned; Registry directed to number and list the appeal for admission.
What the court decided
C.M.P.No.23371 of 2023 in S.A.Sr.No.122672 of 2023
P.T.ASHA, J.,
This petition is filed to condone the delay of 478 days in filing the above appeal in S.A.Sr.No.122672 of 2023.
- Heard Mr,T.Danyakumar, learned counsel for petitioner /appellant and Mr.T.L.Thirumalaisamy, learned counsel for respondents 1 to 3.
- Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is allowed and the delay of 478 days in filing the above appeal in S.A.Sr.No.122672 of 2023 is condoned.
- The Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission. The Registry is also directed to print the name of Mr.T.L.Thirumalaisamy, learned counsel for respondents 1 to 3, when the matter is listed for admission.
07.03.2024
srn
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Should the 478-day delay in filing the second appeal be condoned?
Coram
P.T.Asha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court