Miscellaneous petitions to condone a 3279-day delay, set aside abatement caused by deaths in a second appeal, and bring the legal representative on record. The court ordered all petitions on payment of Rs.2,000 cost and posted for compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.Nos.22010, 22015 and 22012 of 2024 in S.A.No.476 of 2009
C.M.P.Nos.22010, 22015 and 22012 of 2024 in S.A.No.476 of 2009
T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.
The Civil Miscellaneous Petitions have been filed by the petitioner/1st appellant.
T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.
Page No.1/2
C.M.P.Nos.22010, 22015 and 22012 of 2024 in S.A.No.476 of 2009
ksa-2
21.10.2024
ksa-2
C.M.P.Nos.22010, 22015 and 22012 of 2024 in S.A.No.476 of 2009
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.2/2
3 issues framed by the court
Should the delay of 3279 days in filing the application to set aside abatement be condoned?
Should the abatement in S.A.No.476 of 2009 caused by deaths be set aside?
Should the legal representative be brought on record as 3rd appellant?
Petitioner/1st appellant
1st respondent
Respondents 2 and 3 (State)
T.V.Thamilselvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
