M.Raman v. M.Raju
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim application in a pending appeal; service on the 11th respondent remains unserved as both court and private notices were returned, and steps for substituted/corrected service were directed.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.Nos.19455, 19458 & 19465 of 2022 in
A.S.No.996 of 2005
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and R.SAKTHIVEL, J.
One of the legal representatives namely, 11th respondent is yet to be served.
2.Court notice sent to him has been returned with an endorsement 'no such person'. Even private notice returned with an endorsement 'addressee moved'.
3.The learned counsel for the appellant to take steps for service on the 11th respondent through Court as well as privately to the correct address returnable by 04.06.2024.
Post on 04.06.2024.
kkn
Coram
R. SUBRAMANIAN
R. SAKTHIVEL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court