The Assistant Commissioner(St) v. Tvl.Shamrock
Case brief
What is this about?
in W.A.SR.No.80756 of 2023 R.SURESH KUMAR…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.19087 of 2024 in W.A.SR.No.80756 of 2023
R.SURESH KUMAR, J. AND C. SARAVANAN, J.
Heard Mr.G.Nanmaran , learned Special Government Pleader for the petitioners. Despite notice having been served and the name and address of the respondent have been mentioned in the cause-list, there is no representation for the respondent.
This petition is filed to condone the delay of 68 days in filing the appeal.
Having been satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay of 68 days in filing the appeal stands condoned.
drm
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Petitioner(s)
- respondent
Respondent
Coram
R. Suresh Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court