N.K.M.V.C.P. Rao v. P. Krishnan
Case brief
What is this about?
Order allowing a petition to substitute legal heirs of a deceased respondent in a writ appeal. The court impleaded the proposed parties as respondents 21 and 22.
What did the court decide?
Legal heirs impleaded as respondents 21 and 22.
What the court decided
CMP.No.18894/2022 in WA.No.1672/2022
S.S.SUNDAR, J. AND K.RAJASEKAR, J.,
[Order of the Court was made by S.S.SUNDAR, J.,]
The present petition is filed to substitute the proposed respondents as respondents 21 and 22 / legal heirs of the deceased 12th respondent in the writ appeal.
2.The learned counsel for the contesting respondents has no objection in allowing this petition and does not dispute the fact that proposed respondents are the legal heirs of the deceased 12th respondent in the appeal.
3.Since the petitioner / party-inperson only seeks to implead the legal heirs of the deceased 12th respondent on record, this petition stands ordered and the proposed parties are impleaded as respondents 21 and 22 in the writ appeal.
4.Registry is directed to amend the cause title in the writ appeal.
[S.S.S.R., J] [K.R.S., J] 05.08.2024
AP Internet: Yes
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner / Party-in-person
- respondent
Contesting Respondents
Coram
S.S. Sundar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court