Court dismissed the plea for injunction restraining respondents from alienating suit property, noting petitioner lost interest after specific performance suit was dismissed.
Injunction restraining respondents from alienating and encumbering suit property was denied and application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.18690 of 2024 in A.S.No.603 of 2024
C.M.P.No.18690 of 2024 in A.S.No.603 of 2024
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. AND C.KUMARAPPAN, J.
(Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. )
The petitioner seeks for an injunction, restraining the respondents from
alienating and encumbering the suit property, pending the appeal.
Miscellaneous Petition stands dismissed.
(R.S.M, J.) (C.K, J.) 28.11.2024
Sni
1
C.M.P.No.18690 of 2024 in A.S.No.603 of 2024
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. AND C.KUMARAPPAN, J.
Sni
C.M.P.No.18690 of 2024 in A.S.No.603 of 2024
28.11.2024
2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to an injunction restraining respondents from alienating the suit property pending appeal.
Whether the suit petitioner retains interest in the property despite dismissal of the suit for specific performance.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
The Petitioner
The Respondents
R.SUBRAMANIAN
C.KUMARAPPAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
