Application to implead the first respondent as the 40th respondent in a pending second appeal so the proposed party could contest the appeal on merits. The proposed party raised no objection; the petition was allowed and the Registry directed to amend and list the appeal for further hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.17162 of 2023 in
S.A.No.660 of 2014
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.
This petition has been filed to implead the first respondent as the proposed 40th respondent in the Second Appeal in S.A.No.660 of 2014 so as to enable the 2nd respondent to contest the aforesaid proceedings on merits.
28.03.2024
mkn2
Note : Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments and post the appeal on 18.04.2024.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the first respondent should be impleaded as the proposed 40th respondent in the pending second appeal.
Appellant in S.A.No.660 of 2014
First Respondent in S.A.No.660 of 2014 (proposed 40th respondent)
Second Respondent in S.A.No.660 of 2014
V. Lakshminarayanan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
